Jeff
Key currently serves on the Palos Heights City Council and has been an Alderman
for 14 years. Jeff has resided in Palos Heights for nearly 25 years. A retired
teacher and a long-time Officer of an HOA. He and his wife Dianne enjoy strong relationships in the city. Some of his
accomplishments include:
*As
Chair of Public Safety the City Council began using a private crime lab.
*As
Chair of Parks and Recreation he advocated for $6.3 million referendum for the
expansion and renovation of the Palos Heights Recreation Center. With that
major decision two new parks were created (Dream Big Park and Orchard Park) for
a growing demographic of young families.
As
Represemtative to BEAC, worked to create, develop and implement all elements of
the Kris Kringle Market in Palos Heights.
Jeff
has pledged to keep the “small town charm” of Palos Heights while maintaining a
balanced budget and a safe community.
He
will be a goal setter working closely with the corridor business district
forming partnerships to solve parking issues and making Palos Heights a
destination location for those in the south suburban areas of Chicago.
He
is a strong advocate of getting residents involved and will increase use of the
city’s website; and he has a desire to focus on and strengthen the social media
presence for the city.
He
is committed to having one Alderman from each ward on every committee.
We
are pleased to present this interview with Jeff Key.
Q: Jeff, you’ve been
on the Palos Heights City Council for 14 years.
Why, after all this time, have you decided to run for Mayor?
Jeff
Key:
I absolutely love being an Alderman in Palos Heights. It has been especially rewarding for me to
represent the residents of Palos Heights.
The vast majority of the time, all eight Aldermen vote the same
way. Occasionally, an issue will escalate,
and arguments ensue. Over the last four
years, the number of consequential issues has increased, debate and emotions
have increased, and nothing is getting accomplished. The issues involved are serious ones, and
would benefit our residential and business communities. It is my observation that ultimately, three
things are impeding much needed progress: leadership, in the form of collective
goal setting, communication in regard to those goals, and finally, managing the
issues through the committee/council process.
Q: Jeff, sounds like
a somewhat problematic situation is taking place. Can you elaborate with an
example?
Jeff
Key:
Our main business district runs along Harlem Avenue. Parking on the east side of Harlem has been
problematic, enough so that the City’s comprehensive plan contains an objective
specifically aimed at helping with parking issues. “Explore opportunities for additional
parking, and encourage the assemblage and use of adjacent property for
additional parking.” “Work with
residential property owners near Harlem Avenue to convert to retail/service/office
uses and/or parking where appropriate.” Four
years ago, a local resident approached the City and asked if we would be
interested in purchasing his recently deceased mother’s house, located adjacent
to the heart of the business district. The Mayor brought this to the attention
of the City Council. After robust
discussion, the Mayor was directed to get a valuation of the property and then
enter into negotiations in an effort to attain the property. After the information was gathered, the City
agreed to purchase the property and have our engineers draw up plans to raze
the house and construct a fully landscaped and lighted parking lot. Total cost thus far was $250,000.00 of tax
payer’s money. As part of the process of moving this forward, the plan was
presented to the Zoning Board of Appeals.
At this meeting, seven-eight residents spoke in opposition to plan. There was no participation by City
representatives at the meeting. As a
result, the committee voted against the issue.
This means that after the issue comes through the Zoning Committee and
eventually to the Council for final approval, there would need to be a super
majority of affirmative votes to pass.
In the time between voting there was no further communication regarding
the goal of providing much needed parking.
Behind the scenes, several Aldermen were wavering with their vote. Due to this, the issue failed after three
Aldermen had changed their minds. I posit that if there would have been regular
communication and leadership in reminding the Zoning Board of Appeals that we
need to solve the problem of parking, and reminding the Council members of our
collective goal along the way, there would have been a different result.
Q: Thank you for
clarifying with some detail the Palos Heights parking issues. At the October 15,
2024 City Council meeting, you spoke regarding the Building Department’s
failure to adequately provide help to our residents after a May 7th
hail storm damaged over 1100 roofs. What
happened that made you respond the way you did?
Jeff: The hail storm
caused a crisis situation when so many residents requested roof permits at the
same time. The delay immediately went to
three weeks and then jumped to six weeks and then to 12 weeks. I personally talked to the Building
Commissioner about the problem. I was receiving complaints about getting
someone to answer the phone, lack of ability to locate the individual requests
and long delays in obtaining the permits.
With no solutions being offered, I brought the issue up at the Finance
Committee, specifically to the City Administrator. The committee members told him he should hire
additional help. While some help was provided, it fell significantly short of
addressing the overall problems. Instead
of collecting a list of excuses for the lack of response, we should have been
problem solving. There should have been a meeting of the administration and all
department heads, providing a team approach, which could correct the existing
problem. That did not take place. The lack of leadership at the administrative
level and department level failed to provide a solution that our residents
desire and deserve.
Q: In the fall of
2024, the City Council established a $.01 retail tax increase to the Harlem
Avenue Corridor Business District.
What’s the status of that new tax?
Jeff
Key:
In years past, there have been several plans to make needed changes to the
Palos Heights Business District. These
plans cost a lot of money. The problem
was that none of the plans contained a funding apparatus. As a result, nothing was ever
accomplished. After these many years,
the City finally addressed the issue by adding the new $.01 retail tax. In 2024, the City collected more than
$400,000.00. These funds will eventually
be invested into the district where they were collected. There is a tremendous amount of work that
needs to be done in terms of data collection, communication and partnerships
formed with the business community members and our residents. You would think that this past year would be
used for setting collective goals, developing plans for moving forward, and
communicating with residents and business owners of progress made. It is shameful that there has not been one
meeting of the Council to discuss this extremely important issue. Nor has there been any communication by the
administration on moving forward. We have wasted valuable time. How can you
manage goals that were never set?
Q:
Interesting
question. How does one manage goals that have never been set? Moving on to
another significant issue. McNaughton Builders presented plans to the City
Council for a new townhome subdivision on an unincorporated parcel of
property. Whatever happened to that
plan? This would have been a substantial situation of new housing which would have brought in more property tax dollars to Palos Heights.
Jeff
Key:
The parcel of undeveloped property lays between a Palos Heights subdivision and
a golf course which is part of a large subdivision. The plan called for
approximately 60 townhomes starting at just under $600,000.00. The property would be incorporated into the
City of Palos Heights. A narrow piece of
the property coming off the proposed entrance did not align perfectly with 80th
Avenue, directly across 135th Street. Part of the plan would involve attaining a
small, additional portion of property from the golf course. This would allow exiting vehicles to turn
both east and west out of the subdivision. This fact would later become a
sticking point with several of the committee members. The plan came to the Zoning
Committee and was discussed over several months. Residents from the adjacent
subdivisions attended and argued in opposition to the plan. McNaughton Builders
addressed some of these issues that were presented. Many of the issues were
fear-based concerns and not actual problems. People fear change. One example
would be that even though the engineering study stated that all drainage issues
were addressed, residents of the golf course subdivision were convinced that
the water shedding off the new homes would affect the golf course. Both Aldermen from that section of the City
are on the Zoning Committee. During these meetings, arguments arose between the
Aldermen. Instead of solving problems, fear-based concerns were embraced by the
majority members. Meanwhile, there was no intervention on behalf of the
administration. Due to the negativity, and bullying (calling the builder a
liar) by committee members, the builder pulled out. If the administration would
have intervened, pointing out the benefits of the property’s development and
then communicating how the City can help solve concerns, the project would have
advanced through the Council.
Q: I saw in the
newspaper that there was a proposal coming from the Building and Grounds
committee to renovate City Hall. Where is that proposal now?
Jeff
Key:
The Palos Heights City Hall is over 70 tears old. In past years, the building
contained administrative offices, the building department and the police
department. When the Palos Heights Police Department built their own building
24 years ago, City Hall was redesigned to accommodate the current needs. Approximately eight years ago, work began to
renovate portions of the City Hall building, specifically to the accounting
office suite, the entrance area where residents come to pay bills, and the City
Council Chambers where Council meetings are held. The plan that was presented
by the Building and Grounds committee would complete the long-needed renovation
at a cost of $1.8 million. Within the
overall plan, three significant problems needed to be addressed. The HVAC system needs to be replaced at a
cost of $400,000.00. The electrical wiring needs to be replaced as it has
deteriorated to a dangerous level. The
wiring would cost $400,000.00. The bathrooms are falling apart. They look to be
of 1959 vintage with tile breaking up off the floor. The new bathrooms along
with moving some of them to a new location and bringing them up to code
regarding handicap accessibility is an additional $400,000.00. These three
concerns eat up $1.2 million of the overall price of renovation. Building
projects are expensive and there is only one sure fact, --- the project will
cost more next year if we do not start it now.
As per usual, the usual subjects filled the chambers with disgruntled
residents who thought the project was too expensive. The City has the total
amount of the project in our capital funds, coming from federal sources. This will not cost our residents
anything. Arguments ensued and the
project went down in flames. Once again,
no leadership from the administration, no discussion at a Committee of the whole
meeting, no goals set, no communication, no management. We’re still waiting on what we intend to do
regarding the dangerous wiring etc…
Q: Recently, the
City approved a request from the owners of Tiffany Square for a $500,000.00
payment from the City’s TIF (Tax Increment Financing) District to help with the
renovation of their buildings. How does
that work?
Jeff
Key:
TIF financing is the most used state sanctioned apparatus to encourage
development and redevelopment efforts in municipalities. Palos Heights has two TIF districts. The TIF
District at 127th and Harlem was established when the Jewel grocery
store was razed and rebuilt at that location. That TIF is 15 years old. TIF
Districts are limited to 23 years. The
Gateway TIF District is located on a stretch of property on both the east and
west sides of Harlem Avenue north of Route 83.
This district is about 20 years old.
Money collected into a TIF fund must be spent in the district. The clock
is literally ticking, especially with the Gateway TIF. I have personally asked the administration
what the goals are for this TIF. I have
asked the Mayor, the City Administrator and the former Community Development
staff. I have never received an answer. In my 14 years on the City Council, we have
never discussed goals for either TIF District, or what the benefits might
possibly be to request an extension. We
might choose to let it expire, or re-TIF.
Nobody knows, because we never set goals or communicate administrative
intentions. Developers watch which cities
have TIF Districts and what the City response is to requests. Meanwhile Palos Heights is seeming asleep
while the clock ticks away.
Q:
Jeff, thank you very much for your time.
For the record: The current Mayor - Bob Straz has been asked to participate in the interview process. Questions were sent to him and he acknowledged receipt of those questions. Straz and Key are running against one another in the Palos Heights, Illinois mayoral race. It was a must to offer both candidates a Q&A. If and when I receive answers to the questions I will post the interview. The election will be held on Tuesday, April 1, 2025. Early voting begins two weeks prior.
COPYRIGHT
CHICAGO AND THEN SOME 2025